Which element is least appropriate when constructing a well-structured comparative paragraph linking two poems?

• A. Quoting and analysing from both poems
• B. Starting with a clear topic sentence
• C. Considering context and links between texts
• D. Relying solely on narrative summary without quotation

Answer: (D)

In a well-structured comparative paragraph, you build your argument from precise evidence in the poems and show how language choices link the texts. The element that is least appropriate is relying solely on narrative summary without quotation. Without quotation, you miss the exact words that carry meaning and you can’t demonstrate how devices like imagery, diction, and rhythm create effects or highlight similarities and differences. Quoting and analysing from both poems provides concrete evidence and lets you explain how particular phrases illuminate themes. Starting with a clear topic sentence gives a focused road map, and considering context and links helps you situate the poems and reveal connections beyond surface meaning. Together, these practices produce a tight, evidence-based comparison, whereas pure summary leaves the analysis underdeveloped.